[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51602459.3040105@synopsys.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:04:17 +0530
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>,
Pierrick Hascoet <pierrick.hascoet@...lis.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] Gaurantee spinlocks implicit barrier for !PREEMPT_COUNT
> On 04/05/2013 10:06 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Given that we are closing on 3.9 release, and that one/more of these patches fix a
> real issue for us - can you please consider my earlier patch to fix
> timer_pending() only for 3.9 [http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1508224.html]
> This will be a localized / low risk change for this late in cycle.
>
> For 3.10 - assuming preempt_* change is blessed, we can revert this one and add
> that fuller/better fix.
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Thx,
> -Vineet
>
Ping ! Sorry for pestering, but one of the fixes is needed before 3.9 goes out.
Simple localized fix: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1508224.html
Better but risky: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1510885.html
Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists