[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51612408.5060306@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:45:12 +0800
From: Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] thp: too much anonymous hugepage caused 'khugepaged' thread
stopped
On 04/07/2013 03:10 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 02:29:30AM -0400, Zhouping Liu wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> When I did some testing to check thp's performance, the following
>> strange action occurred:
>>
>> when a process try to allocate 500+(or other large value)
>> anonymous hugepage, the 'khugepaged' thread will stop to
>> scan vma. the testing system has 2Gb RAM, and the thp
>> enabled value is 'always', set 0 to 'scan_sleep_millisecs'
>>
>> you can use the following steps to confirm the issue:
>>
>> ---------------- example code ------------
>> /* file test_thp.c */
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> #include <string.h>
>> #include <sys/mman.h>
>>
>> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> {
>> int nr_thps = 1000, ret = 0;
>> unsigned long hugepagesize, size;
>> void *addr;
>>
>> hugepagesize = (1UL << 21);
>>
>> if (argc == 2)
>> nr_thps = atoi(argv[1]);
>>
>> printf("try to allocate %d transparent hugepages\n", nr_thps);
>> size = (unsigned long)nr_thps * hugepagesize;
>>
>> ret = posix_memalign(&addr, hugepagesize, size);
>> if (ret != 0) {
>> printf("posix_memalign failed\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> memset (addr, 10, size);
>>
>> sleep(50);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> -------- end example code -----------
>>
>> executing './test_thp 500' in a system with 2GB RAM, the values in
>> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/* will never change,
>> you can repeatedly do '# cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/*' to check this.
>>
>> as we know, when we set 0 to /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/scan_sleep_millisecs,
>> the /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/full_to_scans will increasing at least,
>> but the actual is opposite, the value is never change, so I checked 'khugepaged' thread,
>> and found the 'khugepaged' is stopped:
>> # ps aux | grep -i hugepaged
>> root 67 10.9 0.0 0 0 ? SN Apr06 172:10 [khugepaged]
>> ^^
>> also I did the same actions on some large machine, e.g on 16Gb RAM, 1000+ anonymous hugepages
>> will cause 'khugepaged' stopped, but there are 2Gb+ free memory, why is it? is that normal?
>> comments?
> khugepaged will preallocate one hugepage in NUMA case or alloc one
> hugepage before collapse in UMA case. If the memory is serious
> fragmentation and can't successfully allocate hugepage, khugepaged
> will go to sleep one minute. scan_sleep_millisecs determines how
> many milliseconds to wait in khugepaged between each pass, however,
> alloc_sleep_millisecs(default value is one minute) determines how
> many milliseconds to wait in khugepaged if there's an hugepage
> allocation failure to throttle the next allocation attempt.
I see, I only set scan_sleep_millisecs, didn't care
alloc_sleep_millisecs value.
yes, you are right, allocating memory failure made khugepaged stopped in
my case.
Thanks very much :)
Zhouping
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists