[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130408115959.GB4395@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:59:59 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: x86/mm/pageattr: Code without effect?
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:53:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> > > have been the source of the confusion. Remove the noop initialization
> > > accordingly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> >
> > Yeah, looks good to me. I've folded it into my pile of changes touching this and
> > there are no visible issues. [...]
>
> Logistics question: is this fix coming upstream-wards via your pile of changes
> anytime soon?
Actually I was thinking Andrea would send it since it is his fix. And
besides, my pile is still stinking. :-)
AFAICT, the patch fixes a noop so the current code works anyway - IOW,
it is basically a code correctness fix which doesn't have any other
effect. What I mean by that is, no need to go in now for 3.9 and stable.
Long story, short: best it would be, IMO, if Andrea would send it to
you soonish but you apply it for 3.10 so that it sees a whole cycle of
testing just in case - it is CPA code after all.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists