linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] ARM: OMAP2+: Adapt to ehci-omap changes for 3.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5162B2D3.6070007@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:06:43 +0200
From:	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, <balbi@...com>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] ARM: OMAP2+: Adapt to ehci-omap changes for
 3.10

Hi Tony,

On 04/05/2013 05:43 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com> [130405 03:00]:
>> On 04/05/2013 10:30 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>   ARM: dts: OMAP4: Add HS USB Host IP nodes
>>>>   ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add HS USB Host IP nodes
>>>>   ARM: dts: omap3-beagle: Add USB Host support
>>>
>>> These 3 DTS patches are good to me, but I cannot applied them on top of
>>> the already existing patches I queued for 3.10.
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git
>>> for_3.10/dts
>>>
>>> Could you rebase these 3 ones only, and I will applied them.
>>
>> Mmm, in fact, I've just seen the pull request from Tony :-(
>>
>>
>> Tony,
>>
>> Don't you want to remove these DTS patches from the pull-request?
> 
> Oops sorry :( Looks like I applied them mistakenly as I saved all
> the patches into a mbox, then applied it. Anyways, too late to start
> messing with it now.
>  
>> Otherwise, I will have to rebase the whole DTS series on top of yours.
>> That being said, if the branch is not supposed to be rebased, it is doable.
> 
> I pulled in your for_3.10/dts for testing, and to me it looks like
> it's just overlapping additions. So that should be OK to resolve while
> pulling it in.
> 
> It seems there's no need to add omap-for-v3.10/usb as a dependency for
> your for_3.10/dts unless the conflict gets non-trivial with some
> additional patches.

The branch was not complete, with the latest additions, we do have
conflict due to the addition of several new nodes at the same place.

The resolution is not that hard since it is addition of node only, but
the rebase on to of omap-for-v3.10/usb will avoid the issue.

I have a new pre-merged branch available. for_3.10/dts_merged is based
on omap-for-v3.10/usb and Paul's omap-devel-b-for-3.10 branch to get the
AM33xx hwmod.
Paul's branch is just needed to avoid AM33xx regression introduced by
Santosh hwmod changes present in my branch.

Just let me know which one you will prefer to pull.

Regards,
Benoit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/