[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOtvUMdT0-oQMTsHAjFqL6K8vrLeCcXG2hX-sShxu6GGRBPxJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:20:44 +0300
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: when handling percpu_pagelist_fraction, use
on_each_cpu() to set percpu pageset fields.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> In free_hot_cold_page(), we rely on pcp->batch remaining stable.
> Updating it without being on the cpu owning the percpu pageset
> potentially destroys this stability.
>
> Change for_each_cpu() to on_each_cpu() to fix.
Are you referring to this? -
1329 if (pcp->count >= pcp->high) {
1330 free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->batch, pcp);
1331 pcp->count -= pcp->batch;
1332 }
I'm probably missing the obvious but won't it be simpler to do this in
free_hot_cold_page() -
1329 if (pcp->count >= pcp->high) {
1330 unsigned int batch = ACCESS_ONCE(pcp->batch);
1331 free_pcppages_bulk(zone, batch, pcp);
1332 pcp->count -= batch;
1333 }
Now the batch value used is stable and you don't have to IPI every CPU
in the system just to change a config knob...
Thanks,
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
gilad@...yossef.com
Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388
US Cell: +1-973-8260388
http://benyossef.com
"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a situation
where the homework eats your dog?"
-- Jean-Baptiste Queru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists