[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=WgbZUrVCeFhXjBGirJmYehy2MDnWYF8OVjyMTgfx5sK5_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:48:52 +0300
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: Li Fei <fei.li@...el.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
"ulf.hansson" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"johan.rudholm" <johan.rudholm@...ricsson.com>,
subhashj <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
"rafael.j.wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"thierry.reding" <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
"sachin.kamat" <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
"Coelho, Luciano" <coelho@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 V2] mmc: core: call pm_runtime_put_noidle in
pm_runtime_get_sync failed case
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Li Fei <fei.li@...el.com> wrote:
> Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
> pm_runtime_put_noidle in such case.
>
> Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Fei <fei.li@...el.com>
Acked-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
BTW, Li, could you please move to _noidle in those other places where
your previous patch was already applied? I think we have at least the
12xx driver (cc'ing Luca).
Thanks!
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists