[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130408100504.5e85ad1c@corrin.poochiereds.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:05:04 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
wine-devel@...ehq.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] CIFS: Add O_DENY* open flags support
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 20:57:51 +0400
Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru> wrote:
> Construct share_access value from O_DENY* flags and send it to
> the server.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru>
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> fs/cifs/dir.c | 3 +++
> fs/cifs/file.c | 4 ++++
> fs/locks.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> index cd4bbf3..7e876b9 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ struct smb_vol {
> CIFS_MOUNT_CIFS_BACKUPUID | CIFS_MOUNT_CIFS_BACKUPGID)
>
> #define CIFS_MS_MASK (MS_RDONLY | MS_MANDLOCK | MS_NOEXEC | MS_NOSUID | \
> - MS_NODEV | MS_SYNCHRONOUS)
> + MS_NODEV | MS_SYNCHRONOUS | MS_SHARELOCK)
>
> struct cifs_mnt_data {
> struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb;
> @@ -947,6 +947,20 @@ struct cifsFileInfo {
> struct work_struct oplock_break; /* work for oplock breaks */
> };
>
> +static inline int
> +cifs_get_share_flags(unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + int share_access = 0;
> +
> + if (!(flags & O_DENYREAD))
> + share_access |= FILE_SHARE_READ;
> + if (!(flags & O_DENYWRITE))
> + share_access |= FILE_SHARE_WRITE;
> + if (!(flags & O_DENYDELETE))
> + share_access |= FILE_SHARE_DELETE;
> + return share_access;
> +}
> +
> struct cifs_io_parms {
> __u16 netfid;
> #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/dir.c b/fs/cifs/dir.c
> index 267b608..d4331de 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/dir.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ cifs_do_create(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry, unsigned int xid,
> else
> cFYI(1, "Create flag not set in create function");
>
> + if (IS_SHARELOCK(inode))
> + share_access = cifs_get_share_flags(oflags);
> +
> /*
> * BB add processing to set equivalent of mode - e.g. via CreateX with
> * ACLs
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 0d524a7..9394b2b 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ cifs_nt_open(char *full_path, struct inode *inode, struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
> *********************************************************************/
>
> disposition = cifs_get_disposition(f_flags);
> + if (IS_SHARELOCK(inode))
> + share_access = cifs_get_share_flags(f_flags);
>
> /* BB pass O_SYNC flag through on file attributes .. BB */
>
> @@ -645,6 +647,8 @@ cifs_reopen_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, bool can_flush)
> }
>
> desired_access = cifs_convert_flags(cfile->f_flags);
> + if (IS_SHARELOCK(inode))
> + share_access = cifs_get_share_flags(cfile->f_flags);
>
> if (backup_cred(cifs_sb))
> create_options |= CREATE_OPEN_BACKUP_INTENT;
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 1eccc75..2184ddd 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -846,10 +846,18 @@ deny_lock_file(struct file *filp)
> {
> struct file_lock *lock;
> int error = 0;
> + const char *fsname = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_sb->s_type->name;
>
> if (!IS_SHARELOCK(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode))
> return error;
>
> + /*
> + * Don't set a lock on CIFS file systems because they can process it
> + * themselves.
> + */
> + if (!strncmp(fsname, "cifs", 4))
> + return error;
> +
NAK....
This is really nasty. Instead of doing this, you should instead create
a new file_system_type->fs_flags value. Then, set that flag for cifs
and nfs4, and test it here.
> error = flock_make_lock(filp, &lock, deny_flags_to_cmd(filp->f_flags));
> if (error)
> return error;
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists