[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5162E8DC.4080204@sr71.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:57:16 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: sched/cputime: sig->prev_stime underflow
On 04/04/2013 04:41 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Does this patch fix the issue for you?
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/4/112
Nope, that doesn't seem to make a difference. I'm still seeing the
underflow. I'm pretty sure it's already gone to hell by the time it
gets in to the loop that's patched there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists