[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5162EC1A.4050204@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:11:06 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not force shutdown/reboot to boot cpu.
On 04/08/2013 08:57 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> I think the original commit:
>
> f96972f2dc63 kernel/sys.c: call disable_nonboot_cpus() in kernel_restart()
>
> actually regressed your 1024 CPU systems, and should possibly be reverted or fixed
> in some other fashion - such as by migrating to the primary CPU (on architectures
> that require that), instead of hotplug offlining every secondary CPU on every
> architecture!
>
> Alternatively, disable_nonboot_cpus() could perhaps be improved to down CPUs in
> parallel: issue the CPU-down requests to every CPU, then wait for them to complete
> - instead of the loop over every CPU?
>
> This would be the conceptual counter part to parallel boot up of CPUs - something
> SGI might be interested in as well?
>
Migrating to the boot processor and then calling stop_machine() to
defang any other processors should be sufficient, no?
I don't know if there is any reason to deschedule all tasks?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists