linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] USB: EHCI multiplatform for 3.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201304081914.30266.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:14:30 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Manjunath Goudar <manjunath.goudar@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] USB: EHCI multiplatform for 3.10

On Monday 08 April 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:23:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > Here are the EHCI patches that I think are good for inclusion in 3.10,
> > I hope you are willing to include them after the debacle over these
> > patches in 3.9.
> > 
> > The patches are all logically independent but sorted by priority,
> > so decide for yourself how many you want to take, starting at the
> > first one. The first six patches all have an Ack from Alan Stern
> > and from the respective ARM platform maintainers.
> 
> I don't see an ACK for the 6th patch from Alan, any reason for that?
> 
> I've applied the first 5 for now, if you want the 6th one applied,
> please resend.

Thanks a lot!

I had mentioned the fact that the last one is missing the ack in my
email, maybe not prominently enough when I wrote:

> > * The final patch is from me and still waiting for an Ack from Alan
> >   Stern, so please wait for his feedback before applying that one.

It would be nice to get that in, but it's not as important for 3.10 since
the only conflict between backends I expect is between Exynos and SPEAr.
SPEAr is not widely used for all I can tell, and whether Exynos actually
makes the multiplatform conversion is still an open question, since there
are a number of missing patches and we are about to close the window for
arm-soc patches as well. In 3.11, things will look quite different.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/