[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130408175734.GH3021@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:57:34 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
rth@...ddle.net, linux@....linux.org.uk, msalter@...hat.com,
starvik@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, monstr@...str.eu,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, jonas@...thpole.se, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, liqin.chen@...plusct.com,
davem@...emloft.net, lethal@...ux-sh.org, vgupta@...opsys.com,
chris@...kel.net, cmetcalf@...era.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, jdike@...toit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: don't show trace beyond show_stack(NULL, NULL)
Hello, Ingo.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:08:11PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
> > {
> > - show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, 0, "");
> > + unsigned long bp = 0;
> > + unsigned long stack;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Stack frames below this one aren't interesting. Don't show them
> > + * if we're printing for %current.
> > + */
> > + if (!sp && (!task || task == current)) {
> > + sp = &stack;
> > + bp = stack_frame(current, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, bp, "");
>
> Hm, show_regs() has a similar problem AFAICS.
Doesn't seem so. show_regs() have pt_regs which gets passed to
dump_trace() and then used to determine the frame being dumped.
e.g. BUG() takes pt_regs from the faulting frame and thus doesn't show
anything beyond it.
kernel BUG at /work/os/work/kernel/workqueue.c:4841!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc1-work+ #7
Hardware name: empty empty/S3992, BIOS 080011 10/26/2007
task: ffff88007c85e040 ti: ffff88007c860000 task.ti: ffff88007c860000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8234a07e>] [<ffffffff8234a07e>] init_workqueues+0x4/0x6
RSP: 0000:ffff88007c861ec8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffff88007c861fd8 RBX: ffffffff824466a8 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000000000046 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff8234a07a
RBP: ffff88007c861ec8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff8234a07a
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: ffff88015f7ff000 CR3: 00000000021f1000 CR4: 00000000000007f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Stack:
ffff88007c861ef8 ffffffff81000312 ffffffff824466a8 ffff88007c85e650
0000000000000003 0000000000000000 ffff88007c861f38 ffffffff82335e5d
ffff88007c862080 ffffffff8223d8c0 ffff88007c862080 ffffffff81c47760
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81000312>] do_one_initcall+0x122/0x170
[<ffffffff82335e5d>] kernel_init_freeable+0x9b/0x1c8
[<ffffffff81c47760>] ? rest_init+0x140/0x140
[<ffffffff81c4776e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
[<ffffffff81c6be9c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81c47760>] ? rest_init+0x140/0x140
...
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists