linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] cgroup: implement cgroup_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130408180335.GA22512@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 20:03:44 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] cgroup: implement cgroup_is_ancestor()

On Mon 08-04-13 16:47:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 08-04-13 16:20:11, Li Zefan wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -5299,6 +5300,26 @@ struct cgroup_subsys_state *cgroup_css_from_dir(struct file *f, int id)
> >  	return css ? css : ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * cgroup_is_ancestor - test "root" cgroup is an ancestor of "child"
> > + * @child: the cgroup to be tested.
> > + * @root: the cgroup supposed to be an ancestor of the child.
> > + *
> > + * Returns true if "root" is an ancestor of "child" in its hierarchy.
> > + */
> > +bool cgroup_is_ancestor(struct cgroup *child, struct cgroup *root)
> > +{
> > +	int depth = child->depth;
> 
> Is this functionality helpful for other controllers but memcg?
> css_is_ancestor is currently used only by memcg code AFAICS and we can
> get the same functionality easily by using something like:

And as it turned out using css_is_ancestor is not correct. Here
is a patch to fix the issue. I will leave the decision whether
cgroup_is_ancestor makes sense even without users to you.
Would you be willing to take this into your current series so that we to
not clash over that code?
---
>From 684e90bf2fcd5e0f376a3c7bb0176c1267add7df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:46:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree

__mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree relies on css_is_ancestor if hierarchy is
enabled for ages. This, however, is not correct because use_hierarchy
doesn't need to be true all the way up the cgroup hierarchy. Consider
the following example:
root (use_hierarchy=0)
 \
  A (use_hierarchy=0)
   \
    B (use_hierarchy=1)
     \
      C (use_hierarchy=1)

__mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(A, C) would return true even though C is
not from the same hierarchy subtree. The bug shouldn't be critical but
at least dump_tasks might print unrelated tasks (via
task_in_mem_cgroup).

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f608546..177bec2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1470,9 +1470,12 @@ bool __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(const struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg,
 {
 	if (root_memcg == memcg)
 		return true;
-	if (!root_memcg->use_hierarchy || !memcg)
+	if (!memcg)
 		return false;
-	return css_is_ancestor(&memcg->css, &root_memcg->css);
+	while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)))
+		if (memcg == root_memcg)
+			return true;
+	return false;
 }
 
 static bool mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(const struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg,
-- 
1.7.10.4

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/