[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUsMGmF2PXMD2W+f7oYBJVudccxoWnisLEsDxXzGgoi0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:37:06 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86, kdump: Set crashkernel_low automatically
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
>> We have now modified crashkernel=X to allocate memory beyong 4G (if
>> available) and do not allocate low range for crashkernel if the user
>> does not specify that with crashkernel_low=Y. This causes regression
>> if iommu is not enabled. Without iommu, swiotlb needs to be setup in
>> first 4G and there is no low memory available to second kernel.
>
> Is it possible to reuse the 1st kernel swiotlb region in 2nd capture
> kernel if it's available?
If the first kernel is using intel iommu, and swiotlb is freed after intel
iommus is enabled in first kernel.
>
>>
>> Set crashkernel_low automatically if the user does not specify that.
>>
>> For system that does support IOMMU with kdump properly, user could
>> specify crashkernel_low=0 to save that 72M low ram.
>
> How about make swiotlb size tunable in 1st kernel as well such as adding
> a swiotlb_size= to cmdline, if it's set in 1st kernel crashkernel
> reserving code can take it automaticlly.
>
can not understand this.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists