[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <516319FF.6030104@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:26:55 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_alloc: convert zone_pcp_update() to use on_each_cpu()
instead of stop_machine()
(4/8/13 1:32 PM), Cody P Schafer wrote:
> On 04/07/2013 08:39 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> (4/5/13 4:33 PM), Cody P Schafer wrote:
>>> No off-cpu users of the percpu pagesets exist.
>>>
>>> zone_pcp_update()'s goal is to adjust the ->high and ->mark members of a
>>> percpu pageset based on a zone's ->managed_pages. We don't need to drain
>>> the entire percpu pageset just to modify these fields. Avoid calling
>>> setup_pageset() (and the draining required to call it) and instead just
>>> set the fields' values.
>>>
>>> This does change the behavior of zone_pcp_update() as the percpu
>>> pagesets will not be drained when zone_pcp_update() is called (they will
>>> end up being shrunk, not completely drained, later when a 0-order page
>>> is freed in free_hot_cold_page()).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> NAK.
>>
>> 1) zone_pcp_update() is only used from memory hotplug and it require page drain.
>
> I'm looking at this code because I'm currently working on a patchset
> which adds another interface which modifies zone sizes, so "only used
> from memory hotplug" is a temporary thing (unless I discover that
> zone_pcp_update() is not intended to do what I want it to do).
maybe yes, maybe no. I don't know temporary or not. However the fact is,
you must not break anywhere. You need to look all caller always.
>> 2) stop_machin is used for avoiding race. just removing it is insane.
>
> What race? Is there a cross cpu access to ->high & ->batch that makes
> using on_each_cpu() instead of stop_machine() inappropriate? It is
> absolutely not just being removed.
OK, I missed that. however your code is still wrong.
However you can't call free_pcppages_bulk() from interrupt context and
then you can't use on_each_cpu() anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists