[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbiB6_cqrgLE1bGS4M6=AgHLwKYxVkENVNETqhX3_wxeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:52:51 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: abx500: Staticize some symbols
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org> wrote:
> These symbols are used only in this file. Without this patch
> we get the following warnings:
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:520:5: warning:
> symbol 'abx500_gpio_request' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:527:6: warning:
> symbol 'abx500_gpio_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:614:5: warning:
> symbol 'abx500_gpio_request_enable' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:714:5: warning:
> symbol 'abx500_pin_config_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c:721:5: warning:
> symbol 'abx500_pin_config_set' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
> ---
> This series is compile tested against linux-next tree (20130319).
Patch applied with Patrice's ACK, thanks!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists