linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: davinci: da850: add EHRPWM & ECAP DT node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EAA9DA3@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:42:27 +0000
From:	"Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@...com>
To:	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
CC:	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	"Manjunathappa, Prakash" <prakash.pm@...com>,
	"jacmet@...site.dk" <jacmet@...site.dk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: davinci: da850: add EHRPWM & ECAP DT node

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 18:39:57, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> 
> On 4/8/2013 2:39 PM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 14:03:34, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> >> On 3/25/2013 1:19 PM, Philip Avinash wrote:
> >>> Add da850 EHRPWM & ECAP DT node.
> >>> Also adds OF_DEV_AUXDATA for EHRPWM & ECAP driver to use EHRPWM & ECAP
> >>> clock.
> >>
> >> This looks fine to me but I will wait for the bindings to get accepted
> >> before taking this one.
> > 
> > Sekhar,
> > 
> > Binding document got accepted in PWM tree [1].
> > Can you accept this patch?
> 
> Can you also add the pinmux definitions and resend just this patch?
> Sorry I did not notice those were missing earlier.

According to latest schematics, ECAP instance 2 being used for PWM backlight
control. Should I add pin-mux only for ECAP2 or for all PWM instances?

Thanks
Avinash

> 
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>