linux-kernel - Re: [4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130409092923.GF3624@the-dreams.de>
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:29:24 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	ben-linux@...ff.org, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
Subject: Re: [4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:23:19PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:06:05AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:57AM -0000, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > It is not good idea to mix static and dynamic I2C adapter numbering. In
> > > this particular case on Lynxpoint we had graphics I2C adapter which took
> > > the first numbers preventing the designware I2C driver from using the
> > > adapter numbers it preferred.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by switching to use dynamic adapter numbering on Intel Lynxpoint.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > I am fearing regressions here if the bus numbering changes.
> 
> There are no users for this dynamic numbering yet since it was introduced
> with the Lynxpoint support.

Please add this to the commit msg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/