[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130409114544.GD7867@spo001.leaseweb.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:45:44 +0200
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pádraig Brady <P@...igBrady.com>
Subject: Re: mfd: Core driver for Winbond chips
Hi Guenter,
> I was waiting for feedback from Wim, who submitted a similar driver, about his
> thoughts. Key question is how to reserve access to the shared resource - either
> through an exported function in the mfd driver requesting a mutex, or through
> request_muxed_region(). I am going back and forth myself on which one is better.
>
> Maybe it does not really matter, but using a function has the slight advantage
> that it auto-loads and locks the mfd module while one of its client modules
> is loaded. If we use request_muxed_region, that is not the case and the client
> module must use another means to request and lock the mfd module.
>
> Maybe you have an opinion ?
This is indeed the main issue that has to be solved. Both options will work.
I like the auto-load and lock, but I need to look at the request_muxed_region
code again first before I can see what the possible drawbacks are :-).
Kind regards,
Wim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists