[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5164160D.7080201@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:22:21 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] nohz: New option to force all CPUs in full dynticks
range
On 13-04-08 10:57 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I think we could simplify things quite a bit if we either
>
> 1. Add any cpus specified with nohz_full/extended=xxx to
> rcu_nocb. No check is then necessary anymore.
>
> or
>
> 2. Avoid the setting of cpus entirely? If full nohz mode is desired
> then pick one cpu (f.e. the first one or the one that is used for xtime
> updates) and then make all other cpus nohz. Set the affinity mask for the
> rcuoXXX threads to that cpu.
I can imagine people with multi socket systems wanting to have
a system partitioned with one "normal" core per physical socket,
for timekeeping, RCU threads, etc, but #2 would prevent that.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists