[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31778276.CDMUtaAAnc@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:03:50 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 9 [cpufreq: NULL pointer deref]
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:47:39 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130408:
> >
> > The vfs tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
> > next-20130405.
> >
> > The wireless-next tree lost its build failure.
> >
> > The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
> > next-20130405.
> >
> > The ftrace tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> >
> > The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the omap_dss2 and gpio-lw trees.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> On reboot I see hanging cpufreq with the help of kdb/kgdb?
> See screenshot.
>
> I have also a screenshot with next-20130326, so this issue seems not to be new.
This is during CPU offline. Does it only happen on reboot? What about trying
to offline/online CPUs from sysfs?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists