linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] clocksource: arch_timer: Push the read/write wrappers deeper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 07:49:20 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] clocksource: arch_timer: Push the read/write wrappers
 deeper

On 04/09/13 02:38, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:30:22AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> -static inline u32 arch_timer_reg_read(const int access, const int reg)
>> +static inline u32 __arch_timer_reg_read(const int access, const int reg)
> Rather than prefixing all of these with "__", why not add "cp15" to the names?
>
> I think that'd make the end result more consistent and clearer, as we'd have a
> _mem version and a _cp15 version of each function.

Sounds fair. I'll make the change.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/