linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH-v2] xen: Don't call arch_trigger_all_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:36:14 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC:	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com" <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tamon Shiose <tamon.shiose@...cle.com>,
	Feng Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH-v2] xen: Don't call
 arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace in dom0(pvm)

On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 08:42 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.04.13 at 07:54, Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com> wrote:
> > nmi isn't supported in dom0, fallback to general all cpu backtrace code.
> 
> Since when is sending NMIs not supported, and since when is this
> Dom0-specific? If you want to deal with this, you should do so
> properly: Special case sending NMIs in the respective Xen specific
> code (using VCPUOP_send_nmi), and carry this out in a way not
> dependent upon running (un)privileged.

You'd also need to implement the upcall support for receiving NMIs,
which IIRC isn't yet done for pvops.

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/