lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:47:42 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries

On 03/26/13 10:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/16/13 12:32, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 3/5/2013 2:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>> Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra,
>>>>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted
>>>>> to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block
>>>>> from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I
>>>>> suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other
>>>>> multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like
>>>>> that though.
>>>> Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which
>>>> version it will go into.
>>>>
>>> Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next
>>> cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will
>>> also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land
>>> in 3.10 as well.
>>>
>>> Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us,
>>> but it doesn't feel right.
>> Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good
>> to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on.
>>
> Arnd?
>

Ping?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ