[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51644855.1090300@semaphore.gr>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:56:53 +0300
From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 linux-next] cpufreq: ondemand: Calculate gradient of
CPU load to early increase frequency
On 04/05/2013 10:50 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On 04/04/2013 07:54 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Stratos,
>>
>> Yes, your results show some improvements. BUT if performance is the only thing
>> we were looking for, then we will never use ondemand governor but performance
>> governor.
>>
>> I suspect this little increase in performance must have increased power numbers
>> too (significantly). So, if you can get numbers in the form of power/performance
>> with and without your patch, it will be great.
>>
>> --
>> viresh
>>
>
> I run some more tests. I increased the number of iterations to 100 (from 20).
> I also test for counter 1,000,000 (~4200us), 5,000,000 (~10000us), 15,000,000 (~30000us).
>
> This time, I also extracted statistics from cpufreq_stats driver. I think this will be an
> indication for power consumption. Below the results and attached the program I used for to
> get these numbers.
Any comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists