[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130409181031.GC6186@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:10:31 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, dm-crypt@...ut.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christian Schmidt <schmidt@...add.de>
Subject: Re: dm-crypt parallelization patches
Hey,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:08:06PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > Hmmm? Why not just keep the issuing order along with plugging
> > boundaries?
>
> What do you mean?
>
> I used to have a patch that keeps order of requests as they were
> introduced, but sorting the requests according to sector number is a bit
> simpler.
You're still destroying the context information. Please just keep the
issuing order along with plugging boundaries.
> > As I wrote before, please use bio_associate_current(). Currently,
> > dm-crypt is completely messing up all the context information that cfq
> > depends on to schedule IOs. Of course, it doesn't perform well.
>
> bio_associate_current() is only valid on a system with cgroups and there
> are no cgroups on the kernel where I tested it. It is an empty function:
>
> static inline int bio_associate_current(struct bio *bio) { return -ENOENT; }
Yeah, because blkcg was the only user. Please feel free to drop the
ifdefs. It covers both iocontext and cgroup association.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists