[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F1EA41C2B@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:30:58 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86, mce: Print warning if MCE handler fails to
register /dev/mcelog
- misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device);
+ if (misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device) != 0)
+ pr_warn("Failed to register mcelog device\n");
Did this actually happen to you? Or is this just "good practice" to check the
return value from misc_register?
If this can really happen, we should remember that it failed and
just drop out of mce_log() early (no point in queueing up records
when there is no way for a user to ever access them).
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists