linux-kernel - Re: [dm-crypt] [dm-devel] dm-crypt performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5164650F.50405@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:59:27 +0200
From:	Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>
To:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
CC:	Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>, dm-crypt@...ut.de,
	Christian Schmidt <schmidt@...add.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] [dm-devel] dm-crypt performance

On 9.4.2013 20:08, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Milan Broz wrote:
> 
>> - Are we sure we are not inroducing some another side channel in disc
>> encryption? (Unprivileged user can measure timing here).
>> (Perhaps stupid reason but please do not prefer performance to security
>> in encryption. Enough we have timing attacks for AES implementations...)
> 
> So use serpent - it is implemented without any data-dependent lookup 
> tables, so it has no timing attacks.

I wish using something different than AES is just such simple technical issue
for many people. But e.g. just try it in FIPS mode where AES is the only option:-)

Anyway, using bio_associate_current() seems to be the right way to try now...

Milan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/