linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/7] uprobes/tracing: Introduce is_ret_probe() and uretprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130409193232.GA27237@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:32:32 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] uprobes/tracing: Introduce is_ret_probe() and
	uretprobe_dispatcher()

Create the new functions we need to support uretprobes, and change
alloc_trace_uprobe() to initialize consumer.ret_handler if the new
"is_ret" argument is true. Curently this argument is always false,
so the new code is never called and is_ret_probe(tu) is false too.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 0c0f0a7..72aa45e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(uprobe_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(uprobe_list);
 
 static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs);
+static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con,
+				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 static inline void init_trace_uprobe_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter)
 {
@@ -89,11 +91,16 @@ static inline bool uprobe_filter_is_empty(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter)
 	return !filter->nr_systemwide && list_empty(&filter->perf_events);
 }
 
+static inline bool is_ret_probe(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
+{
+	return tu->consumer.ret_handler != NULL;
+}
+
 /*
  * Allocate new trace_uprobe and initialize it (including uprobes).
  */
 static struct trace_uprobe *
-alloc_trace_uprobe(const char *group, const char *event, int nargs)
+alloc_trace_uprobe(const char *group, const char *event, int nargs, bool is_ret)
 {
 	struct trace_uprobe *tu;
 
@@ -118,6 +125,8 @@ alloc_trace_uprobe(const char *group, const char *event, int nargs)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tu->list);
 	tu->consumer.handler = uprobe_dispatcher;
+	if (is_ret)
+		tu->consumer.ret_handler = uretprobe_dispatcher;
 	init_trace_uprobe_filter(&tu->filter);
 	return tu;
 
@@ -315,7 +324,7 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
 		kfree(tail);
 	}
 
-	tu = alloc_trace_uprobe(group, event, argc);
+	tu = alloc_trace_uprobe(group, event, argc, false);
 	if (IS_ERR(tu)) {
 		pr_info("Failed to allocate trace_uprobe.(%d)\n", (int)PTR_ERR(tu));
 		ret = PTR_ERR(tu);
@@ -530,6 +539,12 @@ static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void uretprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, unsigned long func,
+				struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	uprobe_trace_print(tu, func, regs);
+}
+
 /* Event entry printers */
 static enum print_line_t
 print_uprobe_event(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags, struct trace_event *event)
@@ -800,6 +815,12 @@ static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	uprobe_perf_print(tu, 0, regs);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static void uretprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, unsigned long func,
+				struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	uprobe_perf_print(tu, func, regs);
+}
 #endif	/* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
 
 static
@@ -854,6 +875,23 @@ static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con,
+				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct trace_uprobe *tu;
+
+	tu = container_of(con, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
+
+	if (tu->flags & TP_FLAG_TRACE)
+		uretprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+	if (tu->flags & TP_FLAG_PROFILE)
+		uretprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs);
+#endif
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct trace_event_functions uprobe_funcs = {
 	.trace		= print_uprobe_event
 };
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/