[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130409193235.GA27244@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:32:35 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] uprobes/tracing: Make uprobe_{trace,perf}_print()
uretprobe-friendly
Change uprobe_trace_print() and uprobe_perf_print() to check
is_ret_probe() and fill ring_buffer_event accordingly.
Also change uprobe_trace_func() and uprobe_perf_func() to not
_print() if is_ret_probe() is true. Note that we keep ->handler()
nontrivial even for uretprobe, we need this for filtering and for
other potential extensions.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 72aa45e..0ed99a2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -516,15 +516,22 @@ static void uprobe_trace_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
int size, i;
struct ftrace_event_call *call = &tu->call;
- size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(false) + tu->size;
+ size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
event = trace_current_buffer_lock_reserve(&buffer, call->event.type,
- size, 0, 0);
+ size + tu->size, 0, 0);
if (!event)
return;
entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
- entry->vaddr[0] = instruction_pointer(regs);
- data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+ if (is_ret_probe(tu)) {
+ entry->vaddr[0] = func;
+ entry->vaddr[1] = instruction_pointer(regs);
+ data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, true);
+ } else {
+ entry->vaddr[0] = instruction_pointer(regs);
+ data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++)
call_fetch(&tu->args[i].fetch, regs, data + tu->args[i].offset);
@@ -535,7 +542,8 @@ static void uprobe_trace_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
/* uprobe handler */
static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- uprobe_trace_print(tu, 0, regs);
+ if (!is_ret_probe(tu))
+ uprobe_trace_print(tu, 0, regs);
return 0;
}
@@ -784,7 +792,7 @@ static void uprobe_perf_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
void *data;
int size, rctx, i;
- size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(false);
+ size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
size = ALIGN(size + tu->size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64)) - sizeof(u32);
if (WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE, "profile buffer not large enough"))
return;
@@ -795,8 +803,15 @@ static void uprobe_perf_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
goto out;
ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
- entry->vaddr[0] = ip;
- data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+ if (is_ret_probe(tu)) {
+ entry->vaddr[0] = func;
+ entry->vaddr[1] = ip;
+ data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, true);
+ } else {
+ entry->vaddr[0] = ip;
+ data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++)
call_fetch(&tu->args[i].fetch, regs, data + tu->args[i].offset);
@@ -812,7 +827,8 @@ static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->consumer, 0, current->mm))
return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
- uprobe_perf_print(tu, 0, regs);
+ if (!is_ret_probe(tu))
+ uprobe_perf_print(tu, 0, regs);
return 0;
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists