linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 6/7] uprobes/tracing: Make seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130409193241.GA27254@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:32:41 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] uprobes/tracing: Make seq_printf() code
	uretprobe-friendly

Change probes_seq_show() and print_uprobe_event() to check
is_ret_probe() and print the correct data.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |   17 +++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 4575762..8c9f489 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -435,9 +435,10 @@ static void probes_seq_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 static int probes_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	struct trace_uprobe *tu = v;
+	char c = is_ret_probe(tu) ? 'r' : 'p';
 	int i;
 
-	seq_printf(m, "p:%s/%s", tu->call.class->system, tu->call.name);
+	seq_printf(m, "%c:%s/%s", c, tu->call.class->system, tu->call.name);
 	seq_printf(m, " %s:0x%p", tu->filename, (void *)tu->offset);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++)
@@ -566,10 +567,18 @@ print_uprobe_event(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags, struct trace_event *e
 	entry = (struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *)iter->ent;
 	tu = container_of(event, struct trace_uprobe, call.event);
 
-	if (!trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx)", tu->call.name, entry->vaddr[0]))
-		goto partial;
+	if (is_ret_probe(tu)) {
+		if (!trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx <- 0x%lx)", tu->call.name,
+					entry->vaddr[1], entry->vaddr[0]))
+			goto partial;
+		data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, true);
+	} else {
+		if (!trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx)", tu->call.name,
+					entry->vaddr[0]))
+			goto partial;
+		data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+	}
 
-	data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
 	for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++) {
 		if (!tu->args[i].type->print(s, tu->args[i].name,
 					     data + tu->args[i].offset, entry))
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/