[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130409191218.GD8212@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 22:12:18 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>
Cc: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] rdma: add a new IB_ACCESS_GIFT flag
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 01:43:49PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Michael R. Hines
> <mrhines@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I also removed the IBV_*_WRITE flags on the sender-side and activated
> > cgroups with the "memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes" activated and the migration
> > with RDMA also succeeded without any problems (both with *and* without GIFT
> > also worked).
>
> Not sure I'm interpreting this correctly. Are you saying that things
> worked without actually setting the GIFT flag? In which case why are
> we adding this flag?
>
> - R.
We are adding the flag to reduce memory when there's lots of COW pages.
There's no guarantee there will be COW pages so I expect things to work
both with and without breaking COW, just using much more memory when we
break COW.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists