[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130409050250.GA2499@netboy>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 07:02:50 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user
samples with kernel samples
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:52PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>
> So thinking this through further, I'm worried we may _not_ be able
> to eventually enable this to be a vdso as I had earlier hoped.
> Mostly because I'm not sure how the fd -> file -> clock lookup could
> be done in userland (any ideas?).
How about a new clock operation, clock_install_vdso(), that lets the
process arrange for one dynamic clock to be reflected in its vdso
page?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists