[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51653C7A.6030405@asianux.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:18:34 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, eparis@...hat.com
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: auditfilter: looping issue, memory leak if has
2 or more AUDIT_FILTERKEYs
in another function: audit_data_to_entry:
a. has the same issue for case AUDIT_WATCH.
b. has an new issue for AUDIT_DIR:
after AUDIT_DIR succeed, it will set rule->tree.
next, the other case fail, then will call audit_free_rule.
but audit_free_rule will not free rule->tree.
I find them only by reading code, not test them.
and I also do not know about the related features.
so please help check my 2 opinions whether are correct.
welcome any suggestion or completions.
thanks.
:-)
gchen.
On 2013年04月10日 17:52, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> in the 'fcount' looping,
> if 'new->fields[*].type" has 2 or more AUDIT_FILTERKEYs
> need judge new->filterkey whether has value, or memory leak.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
> ---
> kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index f9fc54b..936ac79 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,8 @@ struct audit_entry *audit_dupe_rule(struct audit_krule *old)
> &old->fields[i]);
> break;
> case AUDIT_FILTERKEY:
> + if (new->filterkey)
> + break;
> fk = kstrdup(old->filterkey, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (unlikely(!fk))
> err = -ENOMEM;
>
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists