lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201304101422.31601.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:22:31 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Use the BIT macro to replace ugly '(1 << x)'s

On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > Yes, good point. The macro is only used in one place, to compare
> > two compile-time constant values, but we should define macros in
> > drivers that are already provided by the kernel.
> 
> Okay, it looks like the generic implementation has brackets in it,
> which isn't allowed for this particular usecase.

Ah, right.

> I'll fix this one instead.

Probably not worth then. You could open-code the comparison where
it is used and remove the macro if you want, but I probably
would not bother.

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ