[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51655D16.1020908@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:37:42 +0100
From: Serban Constantinescu <Serban.Constantinescu@....com>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Dave Butcher <Dave.Butcher@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] staging: android: binder: fix BINDER_SET_MAX_THREADS
declaration
On 10/04/13 00:53, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Serban Constantinescu
> <serban.constantinescu@....com> wrote:
>> This change will fix the BINDER_SET_MAX_THREADS ioctl to use __s32
>> instead of size_t for setting the max threads. Thus using the same
>> handler for 32 and 64bit kernels.
>>
>> This value is stored internally in struct binder_proc as an int and
>> is set to 15 on open_binder() in the libbinder API (thus no need for
>> a 64bit size_t on 64bit platforms).
>>
>
> Why switch to a signed type?
The value passed through BINDER_SET_MAX_THREADS ioctl is stored in a
binder_proc structure as an int.It also mimics the use of pid_t(typedef
int __kernel_pid_t).
However using __s32 or __u32 here would have the same effect since the
ioctl macro will compute both as sizeof(32bit).
Let me know if you would like this changed to __u32.
Thanks,
Serban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists