linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: dts: Add i2c-arbitrator bus for exynos5250-snow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5165736A.2060308@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:12:58 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, djkurtz@...omium.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	'Russell King' <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>, ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk,
	'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux@...ck-us.net,
	swarren@...dotorg.org, girish.shivananjappa@...aro.org,
	bhushan.r@...sung.com,
	'Naveen Krishna Chatradhi' <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	'Rahul Sharma' <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
	sreekumar.c@...sung.com, 'Simon Glass' <sjg@...omium.org>,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	'Doug Anderson' <dianders@...omium.org>, yuvaraj.cd@...il.com,
	olof@...om.net, prashanth.g@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: dts: Add i2c-arbitrator bus for exynos5250-snow

On 04/10/13 20:02, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:59:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> We need to use the i2c-arbitrator to talk to any of the devices on i2c
>>> bus 4 on exynos5250-snow so that we don't confuse the embedded
>>> controller (EC).  Add the i2c-arbitrator to the device tree.  As we
>>> add future devices (keyboard, sbs, tps65090) we'll add them on top of
>>> this.
>>>
>>> The arbitrated bus is numbered 104 simply as a convenience to make it
>>> easier for people poking around to guess that it might have something
>>> to do with the physical bus 4.
>>>
>>> The addition is split between the cros5250-common and the snow device
>>> tree file since not all cros5250-class devices use arbitration.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@...omium.org>
>>
>> I'm fine on 2nd and 3rd patches. Shall I take only two patches without 1st
>> one in samsung tree?
>
> Please wait for my OK on patch 1. Or ack patches 2 and 3 and I will pick
> them up. I am fine with both.
>
OK, I will wait for your reply on this. Because I suppose if the dt 
patches in your tree could make useless conflicts. Anyway let me know 
your opinion on that.

Thanks.

- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/