[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <516595DC.4090307@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:39:56 +0100
From: Serban Constantinescu <Serban.Constantinescu@....com>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Dave Butcher <Dave.Butcher@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] staging: android: binder: fix alignment issues
On 10/04/13 00:58, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Serban Constantinescu
> <serban.constantinescu@....com> wrote:
>> The Android userspace aligns the data written to the binder buffers to
>> 4bytes. Thus for 32bit platforms or 64bit platforms running an 32bit
>> Android userspace we can have a buffer looking like this:
>>
>> platform buffer(binder_cmd pointer) size
>> 32/32 32b 32b 8B
>> 64/32 32b 64b 12B
>> 64/64 32b 64b 12B
>>
>> Thus the kernel needs to check that the buffer size is aligned to 4bytes
>> not to (void *) that will be 8bytes on 64bit machines.
>>
>> The change does not affect existing 32bit ABI.
>>
>
> Do we not want the pointers to be 8 byte aligned on 64bit platforms?
No since here we do not align pointers we align binder_buffers and
offsets in a buffer.
Let's assume that from the userspace we receive a sequence of BC_INCREFS
and BC_FREE_BUFFER. According to their definitions the buffer would look
like:
Buffer:
[addr] [element]
0 BC_INCREFS
4 __u32
8 BC_FREE_BUFFER
12 void * //(8 bytes for 64bit or 4 bytes for 32bit)
Thus the data_size(sizeof(Buffer)) will be 20 bytes for 64bit
systems(4bytes aligned). Same explanation for offp where it represents
the offset form the start of the buffer to a flat_binder_object(for
example here the offset to void* - 12bytes).
Thanks,
Serban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists