linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: make IDT read-only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <516597DB.4020208@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:48:27 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>
CC:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	lf-virt <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make IDT read-only

On 04/10/2013 09:31 AM, Eric Northup wrote:
>>
>> If the effect is measurable I agree it is a legitimate optimization.  At
>> one point there was a suggestion to make the code in the IDT vectors
>> differ based on the which interrupt was registed.  While that can also
>> reduce cache misses that can get hairy very quickly, and of course that
>> would require read-write IDTs.
> 
> read-write IDT or GDT are fine: map them twice, once read+write, once
> read-only.  Point the GDTR and IDTR at the read-only alias.
> 

Well, it is weaker, because if you can discover the pointer to the
writable alias you win.

Now, as has been pointed out the GDT needs to be writable on 32 bits as
a matter of hardware requirement.  However, doing it for 64 bits only is
probably enough of a win.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/