[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205594BABA@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:47:25 +0000
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Early microcode signing in secure boot environment - Was: x86,
microcode: Use common get_ramdisk_image()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Renninger [mailto:trenn@...e.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:41 AM
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 01:34:33 PM Tang Chen wrote:
> > On 04/05/2013 07:46 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > Use common get_ramdisk_image() to get ramdisk start phys address.
> > >
> > > We need this to get correct ramdisk adress for 64bit bzImage that
> > > initrd can be loaded above 4G by kexec-tools.disk_size;
>
> don't know whether this question came up when this feature got
> submitted (if yes a pointer would be appreciated).
>
> Is there a concept how signed microcode can get verified when applied
> early,
> like it is done via firmware loader?
>
> If not, early microcode loading is not really usable in secure boot
> environment, right?
The microcode is cryptographically authenticated by the CPU itself, so there is no security issue related to early microcode loading.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists