[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130410185414.GE17641@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:54:14 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
rth@...ddle.net, linux@....linux.org.uk, msalter@...hat.com,
starvik@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, monstr@...str.eu,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, jonas@...thpole.se, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, liqin.chen@...plusct.com,
davem@...emloft.net, lethal@...ux-sh.org, vgupta@...opsys.com,
chris@...kel.net, cmetcalf@...era.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, jdike@...toit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: don't show trace beyond show_stack(NULL, NULL)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Ok - but my other observation probably holds, that the bp == 0 special case in
> dump_trace() should be changed to a [printk()-ed] warning or so? No user will pass
> in bp == 0 legitimately, AFAICS.
Yeah, seems so. I'll verify and add a warning message if both @bp and
@regs aren't specified in dump_trace().
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists