linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/18] compat: backport ASYNC_DOMAIN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1365622074.4235.37.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:27:54 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
Cc:	"backports@...r.kernel.org" <backports@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] compat: backport ASYNC_DOMAIN_EXCLUSIVE()

On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 12:19 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> > However, it seems entirely pointless to backport just a small part of
> > the API?
> 
> Oh I agree don't get me wrong, however porting kernel/async.c seems
> like a rather separate effort worth considering. As-is though I have
> not seen any negative impact though to keep older subsystems from
> compiling, ie its a no-op for older kernels as I see it.

I guess that's what I don't understand -- I don't see usages of
ASYNC_DOMAIN_EXCLUSIVE in any header files, and in e.g. regulator/core.c
you'd also need the functions async_schedule_domain() etc. So where does
this help even compiling?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/