[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304101505250.1526@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxram@...ibm.com,
guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com, tmac@...com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
tangchen@...fujitsu.com, jiang.liu@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] resource: Add release_mem_region_adjustable()
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > I'll switch it to GFP_ATOMIC. Which is horridly lame but the
> > allocation is small and alternatives are unobvious.
>
> Great! Again, thanks for the update!
release_mem_region_adjustable() allocates at most one struct resource, so
why not do kmalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL) before taking
resource_lock and then testing whether it's NULL or not when splitting?
It unnecessarily allocates memory when there's no split, but
__remove_pages() shouldn't be a hotpath.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists