linux-kernel - [ 43/64] crypto: gcm - fix assumption that assoc has one segment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130410224343.327780087@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:46:40 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Chaoxing Lin <Chaoxing.Lin@...ra-3eti.com>,
	Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@....fi>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: [ 43/64] crypto: gcm - fix assumption that assoc has one segment

3.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@....fi>

commit d3dde52209ab571e4e2ec26c66f85ad1355f7475 upstream.

rfc4543(gcm(*)) code for GMAC assumes that assoc scatterlist always contains
only one segment and only makes use of this first segment. However ipsec passes
assoc with three segments when using 'extended sequence number' thus in this
case rfc4543(gcm(*)) fails to function correctly. Patch fixes this issue.

Reported-by: Chaoxing Lin <Chaoxing.Lin@...ra-3eti.com>
Tested-by: Chaoxing Lin <Chaoxing.Lin@...ra-3eti.com>
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@....fi>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 crypto/gcm.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/crypto/gcm.c
+++ b/crypto/gcm.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct crypto_rfc4543_ctx {
 
 struct crypto_rfc4543_req_ctx {
 	u8 auth_tag[16];
+	u8 assocbuf[32];
 	struct scatterlist cipher[1];
 	struct scatterlist payload[2];
 	struct scatterlist assoc[2];
@@ -1142,9 +1143,19 @@ static struct aead_request *crypto_rfc45
 	scatterwalk_crypto_chain(payload, dst, vdst == req->iv + 8, 2);
 	assoclen += 8 + req->cryptlen - (enc ? 0 : authsize);
 
-	sg_init_table(assoc, 2);
-	sg_set_page(assoc, sg_page(req->assoc), req->assoc->length,
-		    req->assoc->offset);
+	if (req->assoc->length == req->assoclen) {
+		sg_init_table(assoc, 2);
+		sg_set_page(assoc, sg_page(req->assoc), req->assoc->length,
+			    req->assoc->offset);
+	} else {
+		BUG_ON(req->assoclen > sizeof(rctx->assocbuf));
+
+		scatterwalk_map_and_copy(rctx->assocbuf, req->assoc, 0,
+					 req->assoclen, 0);
+
+		sg_init_table(assoc, 2);
+		sg_set_buf(assoc, rctx->assocbuf, req->assoclen);
+	}
 	scatterwalk_crypto_chain(assoc, payload, 0, 2);
 
 	aead_request_set_tfm(subreq, ctx->child);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/