[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51665A0E.7080607@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:37:02 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 4/5] netback: set transport header before passing it
to kernel
On 04/10/2013 09:33 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:19 +0000, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Currently, for the packets receives from netback, before doing header check,
>> kernel just reset the transport header in netif_receive_skb() which pretends non
>> l4 header. This is suboptimal for precise packet length estimation (introduced
>> in 1def9238: net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation) which needs correct l4
>> header for gso packets.
>>
>> The patch just reuse the header probed by netback for partial checksum packets
>> and tries to use skb_flow_dissect() for other cases, if both fail, just pretend
>> no l4 header.
>>
>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> index aa28550..fc8faa7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>> #include <linux/udp.h>
>>
>> #include <net/tcp.h>
>> +#include <net/flow_keys.h>
>>
>> #include <xen/xen.h>
>> #include <xen/events.h>
>> @@ -1184,6 +1185,7 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
>> goto out;
>>
>> + skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
>> skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
> Should the use of th here (and perhaps above) be replaced with
> skb_transport_header() too?
Yes, and furthermore looks like we can use skb_partial_csum_set() here,
will send a patch.
Thanks
>> switch (iph->protocol) {
>> case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> @@ -1495,6 +1497,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
>>
>> skb->dev = vif->dev;
>> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, skb->dev);
>> + skb_reset_network_header(skb);
>>
>> if (checksum_setup(vif, skb)) {
>> netdev_dbg(vif->dev,
>> @@ -1503,6 +1506,15 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> + if (!skb_transport_header_was_set(skb)) {
>> + struct flow_keys keys;
>> +
>> + if (skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
>> + skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.thoff);
>> + else
>> + skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
>> + }
>> +
>> vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
>> vif->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists