[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130411082519.GD31465@quad.lixom.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:25:19 -0700
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v6] arm: introduce psci_smp_ops and use them on Xen
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
> do you have any thoughts on this series?
> Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?
>
> The last patch, "xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen" has
> a (small) dependency on this series:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136430893610688&w=2
>
> would you be OK with taking that one too, or should that go through the
> Xen tree?
I think it'd make sense to get Russell to ack the changes to the core ARM code.
We can merge the series through arm-soc, or he can take them, whatever is
easiest for everybody.
Given the dependencies on the second branch it might be easier to merge
through Russell's tree.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists