[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5166D390.8050704@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:15:28 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Mitsuhiro Tanino <mitsuhiro.tanino.gm@...achi.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, kosaki.motohiro@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 0/2] mm: Add parameters to make kernel behavior at
memory error on dirty cache selectable
(4/10/13 11:26 PM), Mitsuhiro Tanino wrote:
> Hi All,
> Please find a patch set that introduces these new sysctl interfaces,
> to handle a case when an memory error is detected on dirty page cache.
>
> - vm.memory_failure_dirty_panic
Panic knob is ok to me. However I agree with Andi. If we need panic know,
it should handle generic IO error and data lost.
> - vm.memory_failure_print_ratelimit
> - vm.memory_failure_print_ratelimit_burst
But this is totally silly.
print_ratelimit might ommit important messages. Please do a right way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists