linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] net: count hw_addr syncs so that unsync works properly.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130410.205401.1135160208998128324.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:54:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jhbird.choi@...sung.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	vyasevic@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] net: count hw_addr syncs so that unsync
 works properly.

From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:31:44 +0900

> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
> it?

I queue up networking patches as needed and that queue is
visible at:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/user/bundle/2566/?state=*

and yes this patch, along with many others, are there.

I submit networking patches to -stable at a time of my
own choosing, in an effort to allow bug fixes to cook
in Linus's tree for some time just in case the fixes
themselves have bugs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/