[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5166FBD4.5020508@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:07:16 +0200
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: Soeren Moch <smoch@....de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Dale Farnsworth <dale@...nsworth.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mv643xx_eth: Add GRO support
On 04/11/2013 07:55 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 14:40 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> This patch adds GRO support to mv643xx_eth by making it invoke
>> napi_gro_receive instead of netif_receive_skb.
>
> The inet_lro support should be removed at the same time; inet_lro is now
> deprecated and there should be no need to keep both of them.
Ben,
I agree on removing it asap, but I also like to see GRO support
in. Maybe, we postpone lro removal just a little bit. I have just
started to look at mv643xx_eth and remember Marvell Orion SoCs are
not the only platform using it. I haven't heard a single word from
ppc guys, yet.
Willy just posted an experimental patch to remove lro. I'll have
a look at it and test it out on Dove.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists