[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130411191742.GA8251@cantiga.alporthouse.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:17:42 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@....fi>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: don't check inconsistent modeset state when
force-restoring
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:22:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It will be only consistent once we've restored all the crtcs. Since a
> bunch of other callers also want to just restore a single crtc, add a
> boolean to disable checking only where it doesn't make sense.
>
> Note that intel_modeset_setup_hw_state already has a call to
> intel_modeset_check_state at the end, so we don't reduce the amount of
> checking.
>
> v2: Try harder not to create a big patch (Chris).
>
> v3: Even smaller (still Chris). Also fix a trailing space.
>
> References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/16/60
> Cc: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@....fi>
> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
I'm happy that you are not touching any paths other than mentioned in
the changelog, and that I think being quiet on the modeset is a good use
of the 'force' semantics, so
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists