[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130411195203.GA11956@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:52:03 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, dm-crypt@...ut.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christian Schmidt <schmidt@...add.de>,
"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] make dm and dm-crypt forward cgroup context (was:
dm-crypt parallelization patches)
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:49:20PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> If the bi_css pointer points to a structure that is shared between
> processes, using atomic instruction causes cache line boucing - it doesn't
> cost a few instructions, it costs 2-3 hundreds cycles.
>
> I modified the patch to use new flag BIO_DROP_CGROUP_REFCOUNT to note that
> the refcount must be decremented - if the flag is set, refcounts must be
> decremented when bio is destroyed, if it is not set, references are
> borrowed from upper layer bio.
>
> It is less bug-prone than the previous patch.
If this becomes an actual bottleneck, the right thing to do is making
css ref per-cpu. Please stop messing around with refcounting.
NACK.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists